Linguistic Inquiry , 19, 35— Google Scholar. Bock, K. Syntactic persistence in language production.
Universität Düsseldorf: Detailseite
Cognitive Psychology , 18, — Bock, J. Closed class immanence in sentence production. Cognition , 31, — Framing sentences.
Cognition , 35, 1— From Conceptual roles to structural relations: Bridging the syntactic cleft. Psychological Review , 99, 15— Broken agreement.
Cognitive Psychology , 23, 45— Bosshardt, H. Archiv der Psychologie , , — Branigan, H. Syntactic priming: Investing the mental representation of language.
Call for Papers
Journal of Psycholinguistic Research. A cross-linguistic perspective on discourse context and syntactic processing in language production. In this volume.
Chomsky, N. Aspects of the theory of syntactic structure. Cambridge Mass. Lectures on Government and Binding. Dordrecht: Foris. The Minimalist Program.
- Troubled Partnership: U.S.-Turkish Relations in an Era of Global Geopological Change.
- Python Data Visualization Cookbook (2nd Edition).
- Account Options.
- Argument Structure And Syntactic Relations A Cross Linguistic Perspective - noicrafpenrodi.tk?
- Instrumental Teaching in Nineteenth-Century Britain (Music in Nineteenth-Century Britain).
- See a Problem?.
- William Croft.
Current Studies in Linguistics, Cambridge, Mass. The use of syntactic information in filling gaps. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research , 15, — Estival, D. Syntactic priming of the passive in English, Text , 5, 7— Fillmore, C The case for case. Harms Eds.
ERC Project "Grammatical Universals" at Leipzig University, plus guests (Nikolaistrasse 10)
Fodor, J. Processing empty categories: A question of visibility. Shillcock Eds. Hillsdale, N. Frazier, L.
Successive cyclicity in the grammar and parser. Language and Cognitive Processes , 4, 93— Freedman, S. Bestselling Series. Harry Potter. Popular Features. New Releases. Categories: Linguistics Grammar, Syntax. Notify me.https://enereced.tk
Argument Structure and Syntactic Relations : A cross-linguistic perspective
Description The topic of this collection is argument structure. Rigorous theoretical analyses are combined with empirical work on specific aspects of argument structure. The book brings together authors working in different linguistic fields semantics, syntax, and language acquisition , who explore new findings as well as more established data, but then from new theoretical perspectives.
The contributions propose cartographic views of argument structure, as opposed to minimalistic proposals of a binary template model for argument structure, in order to optimally account for various syntactic and semantic facts, as well as data derived from wider cross-linguistic perspectives. Product details Format Hardback pages Dimensions Table of contents 1.
Argument structure and syntactic relations by Duguine, Maia ; 2. Part 1. Penelope Brown's research and publications concern the relationship between culture and language and cognition. The central focus of her work is the study of language use in its sociocultural context. Her child language research uses crosslinguistic methodology to study the acquisition of morphology and semantics, language socialization, and social interaction of prelinguistic infants and caregivers.
New from Cambridge University Press!
Her research on adult language ranges across the study of spatial language and cognition, crosscultural comparison of conversational structure and inference, the systematics of social interaction, the expression of social relations in speech, and principles of linguistic politeness. Crosslinguistic Perspectives on Argument Structure. Melissa Bowerman , Penelope Brown.
Crosslinguistic Perspectives on Argument Structure: Implications for Learnability offers a unique interdisciplinary perspective on argument structure and its role in language acquisition. Drawing on a broad range of crosslinguistic data, this volume shows that languages are much more diverse in their argument structure properties than has been realized. This diversity raises challenges for many existing proposals about language acquisition, affects the range of solutions that can be considered plausible, and highlights new acquisition puzzles that until now have passed unnoticed.